Posted by
darrel on Saturday, November 15, 2008 12:24:22 AM
In the wake of the victory of Prop.8 in California, there has been a total lack of acceptance of the results by those who demand tolerance from everybody else. If the vote had gone the other way, the gay/lesbian crowd would have been flaunting their victory in everybody’s faces and demanding that they accept the results.
The question that all should be asking is: is there really a genetic difference between those claiming to be gay and those who are heterosexual? Is there a gay gene?
Gays have attempted to equate their quest to black America’s quest for equality, but is there really any comparison?
Genetically if a person is of the Negroid bone structure, he or she is without doubt, a Negro; a term that has become socially unacceptable, yet still factual. Whites are of the Caucasoid bone structure and Orientals are of the Mongoloid bone structure. A white man or woman or an Oriental man or woman cannot change who they are any more than a person of Negroid bone structure can. It is a genetic trait.
Now, what is the difference between a man and a woman? Males of all species of mammals produce sperm and females of all species of mammals produce ovum, or eggs. The female egg is infertile until the male sperm unites with it, causing a new life form within the female womb. All mammals that are capable of producing sperm are male. All mammals that are capable of producing ovum are female. Seems simple enough. However, claims are being made that there is some sort of gene that causes some males to want to “mate” with other males, and females to “mate” with other females.
As a black person cannot claim that he or she is of the Caucasoid or Mongoloid bone structure, neither can a male or female capable of reproduction claim that they cannot. Being gay is a matter of choice, not genetics, the same way that alcoholism is a matter of choice or smoking is a matter of choice or overeating is a matter of choice. It is a harmful choice, as are the others, but it is a choice.
In today’s society, children as young as pre-school are being indoctrinated into believing that they may be gay, and to not fight it. Children who have no concept of sexual orientation are being swayed toward accepting that they might be gay because they might find themselves feeling closer to or more comfortable with, someone of their own sex than of the opposite sex. That has always been the way it has been. Young boys hang around with young boys and young girls are more at home with their girlfriends. There is no gene that makes them want to hang with their peers, it’s just the way nature has always been. Little girls play with dolls, boys play with toy guns and footballs. Very few boys want to play with dolls and few girls want to play football. There are some who do, but very few. Also, a girl playing football with the boys or a boy playing house with the girls doesn’t mean they have a tendency to be gay. It might just mean that down deep, they want the other’s company as a fellow human being who they like.
California seems to have an overabundance of those who think that there is some sort of gene that doctors can’t find that makes them “the way they are”. Bunk! There is no gay gene. Asking the majority of Americans to be tolerant of gays while “gays” themselves display absolutely no tolerance toward “straight” people who comprise a majority of the voters in California is a kind of irony.
If the situation wasn’t so tragic, it would be funny!
At least, that's my view.